Vendors · Comparison
CoreWeave vs Databricks Model Serving
Side-by-side comparison of CoreWeave and Databricks Model Serving for single-tenant LLM hosting. Deployment options, compliance, pricing, and operational fit compared.
CoreWeave
Security page states every CKS node is single-tenant; CKS runs Kubernetes directly on bare-metal nodes without a hypervisor. SOC 2 Type II scope covers Bare Metal and CKS. Trust centre shows ISO 27001/27017/27018 badges but the security page uses "aligned with" wording, so ISO 27001 is excluded (https://www.coreweave.com/security). Terms name CoreWeave, Inc. under New York law.
Databricks Model Serving
Mosaic AI Model Serving deploys custom MLflow models and fine-tuned foundation models on Databricks-managed serverless compute; provisioned throughput allocates dedicated inference capacity. Trust pages list ISO 27001:2022 (including AWS single-tenant), SOC 2 Type II report on request, HIPAA options, FedRAMP Moderate/High; a standard BAA is published. DPA with SCCs published. Databricks, Inc. is headquartered in San Francisco.
From the data
Key differences
- Category CoreWeave is a Dedicated GPU offering; Databricks Model Serving is Managed self-host.
- Compliance Both document SOC 2 Type II and GDPR DPA. Only Databricks Model Serving documents ISO 27001, HIPAA BAA and FedRAMP.
- Data residency Neither has a verified data residency guarantee.
- Jurisdiction Both parent companies are under US jurisdiction.
- Pricing CoreWeave: Per-GPU-hour on-demand and spot; reserved capacity at up to 60% discount (published pricing). Databricks Model Serving: Per DBU per hour by GPU instance size (e.g. A10G 20 DBU/hour); per-token Foundation Model APIs (published pricing).
Generated from the verified vendor data below; sources and dates on each vendor profile.
Side by side
Capabilities compared
| CoreWeave | Databricks Model Serving | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dedicated GPU | Managed self-host |
| Deployment models | Bare metalManaged KubernetesOn-demandSpotReserved capacity | Custom model servingProvisioned throughputPay-per-token endpoints |
| Regions | US, UK, Europe | US, Europe, Asia-Pacific |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIGDPR DPA | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001HIPAA BAAFedRAMPGDPR DPA |
| Pricing model | Per-GPU-hour on-demand and spot; reserved capacity at up to 60% discount | Per DBU per hour by GPU instance size (e.g. A10G 20 DBU/hour); per-token Foundation Model APIs |
| Public pricing | Yes | Yes |
| Residency guarantee | Not verified | Not verified |
| Parent jurisdiction | US | US |
| Analyst note | Security page states every CKS node is single-tenant; CKS runs Kubernetes directly on bare-metal nodes without a hypervisor. SOC 2 Type II scope covers Bare Metal and CKS. Trust centre shows ISO 27001/27017/27018 badges but the security page uses "aligned with" wording, so ISO 27001 is excluded (https://www.coreweave.com/security). Terms name CoreWeave, Inc. under New York law. | Mosaic AI Model Serving deploys custom MLflow models and fine-tuned foundation models on Databricks-managed serverless compute; provisioned throughput allocates dedicated inference capacity. Trust pages list ISO 27001:2022 (including AWS single-tenant), SOC 2 Type II report on request, HIPAA options, FedRAMP Moderate/High; a standard BAA is published. DPA with SCCs published. Databricks, Inc. is headquartered in San Francisco. |
Where they diverge
Deployment differentiation
Only CoreWeave
Both
No overlap in deployment models.
Only Databricks Model Serving
Read the full profiles