Vendors · Comparison
Baseten vs CoreWeave
Side-by-side comparison of Baseten and CoreWeave for single-tenant LLM hosting. Deployment options, compliance, pricing, and operational fit compared.
Baseten
Dedicated deployments and an enterprise self-hosted option position Baseten for single-tenant use. No public data-residency guarantee found at review; trust centre lists subprocessors across multiple clouds.
CoreWeave
Security page states every CKS node is single-tenant; CKS runs Kubernetes directly on bare-metal nodes without a hypervisor. SOC 2 Type II scope covers Bare Metal and CKS. Trust centre shows ISO 27001/27017/27018 badges but the security page uses "aligned with" wording, so ISO 27001 is excluded (https://www.coreweave.com/security). Terms name CoreWeave, Inc. under New York law.
From the data
Key differences
- Category Both are Dedicated GPU offerings.
- Compliance Both document SOC 2 Type II and GDPR DPA. Only Baseten documents SOC 3 and HIPAA BAA.
- Data residency Neither has a verified data residency guarantee.
- Jurisdiction Both parent companies are under US jurisdiction.
- Pricing Baseten: Per 1M tokens (Model APIs); per-minute GPU/CPU instances for dedicated deployments (published pricing). CoreWeave: Per-GPU-hour on-demand and spot; reserved capacity at up to 60% discount (published pricing).
Generated from the verified vendor data below; sources and dates on each vendor profile.
Side by side
Capabilities compared
| Baseten | CoreWeave | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dedicated GPU | Dedicated GPU |
| Deployment models | Dedicated deploymentSelf-hostedHybrid | Bare metalManaged KubernetesOn-demandSpotReserved capacity |
| Regions | US, UK, Europe, Asia-Pacific | US, UK, Europe |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IISOC 3HIPAA BAAGDPR DPA | SOC 2 Type IIGDPR DPA |
| Pricing model | Per 1M tokens (Model APIs); per-minute GPU/CPU instances for dedicated deployments | Per-GPU-hour on-demand and spot; reserved capacity at up to 60% discount |
| Public pricing | Yes | Yes |
| Residency guarantee | Not verified | Not verified |
| Parent jurisdiction | US | US |
| Analyst note | Dedicated deployments and an enterprise self-hosted option position Baseten for single-tenant use. No public data-residency guarantee found at review; trust centre lists subprocessors across multiple clouds. | Security page states every CKS node is single-tenant; CKS runs Kubernetes directly on bare-metal nodes without a hypervisor. SOC 2 Type II scope covers Bare Metal and CKS. Trust centre shows ISO 27001/27017/27018 badges but the security page uses "aligned with" wording, so ISO 27001 is excluded (https://www.coreweave.com/security). Terms name CoreWeave, Inc. under New York law. |
Where they diverge
Deployment differentiation
Only Baseten
Both
No overlap in deployment models.
Only CoreWeave
Read the full profiles